CO129-321 - Public Offices & Others - 1903 — Page 724

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

717

-3-

was laid out upon that understanding, and a contract was entered into upon that basis without any further reference whatever to the Director of Public Works other than the submission of the plan previously mentioned.

We have referred to the copies of the correspondence, dealing with the question of permanent way construction and the cross section submitted by us which has passed between the Director of Public Works, the agents of the Yangtse Valley Co. and Messrs Leigh & Orange, acting for the agents, and in none of these do we find a single sentence upon the question of poles.

As the principle upon which the poles were to be granted was settled in April 1901, and the form of permanent way construction to be adopted was not absolutely accepted by the Company until after the receipt of the letter from your Department of the 15th August 1903, and as it had been previously agreed that the form of permanent way construction to be employed should be settled by your Department, there could not have been an arrangement to concrete the full distance between the tracks providing the Company were allowed to erect centre poles.

Is it not fully demonstrated that the requirements of the Director of Public Works have never been accepted by us by the fact that we have been in negotiations with your Department, and that it was not until the 28th July 1903 that, so as to permit of the work being carried out, we cabled to our representative upon the spot instructing him to agree to the demands of the Director of Public Works save the question of the strip of concrete between the tracks, leaving this point to the decision of your Department.

The Company are, and always have been, prepared to concrete for the full width between the tracks in the case of centre poles if the Director of Public Works would not insist upon the Company spending money, which they considered quite unnecessary, in burying concrete in the roadway, but as the Director of Public Works insisted upon this, the Company had to stand upon their rights.

Edit History

2026-06-01 14:42:00 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
717 -3- was laid out upon that understanding, and a contract was entered into upon that basis without any further reference whatever to the Director of Public Works other than the submission of the plan previously mentioned. We have referred to the copies of the correspondence, dealing with the question of permanent way construction and the cross section submitted by us which has passed between the Director of Public Works, the agents of the Yangtse Valley Co. and Messrs Leigh & Orange, acting for the agents, and in none of these do we find a single sentence upon the question of poles. As the principle upon which the poles were to be granted was settled in April 1901, and the form of permanent way construction to be adopted was not absolutely accepted by the Company until after the receipt of the letter from your Department of the 15th August 1903, and as it had been previously agreed that the form of permanent way construction to be employed should be settled by your Department, there could not have been an arrangement to concrete the full distance between the tracks providing the Company were allowed to erect centre poles. Is it not fully demonstrated that the requirements of the Director of Public Works have never been accepted by us by the fact that we have been in negotiations with your Department, and that it was not until the 28th July 1903 that, so as to permit of the work being carried out, we cabled to our representative upon the spot instructing him to agree to the demands of the Director of Public Works save the question of the strip of concrete between the tracks, leaving this point to the decision of your Department. The Company are, and always have been, prepared to concrete for the full width between the tracks in the case of centre poles if the Director of Public Works would not insist upon the Company spending money, which they considered quite unnecessary, in burying concrete in the roadway, but as the Director of Public Works insisted upon this, the Company had to stand upon their rights.
Baseline (Original)
717 -3- was laid out upon that understanding, and a contract was entered into upon that basis without any further reference whatever to the Director of Pub'in Works other than the submission of the plan previously mentioned. * We have referred to the copies of the correspondence, dealing with the question of permanent way construction and the cross sention submitted by us which has passed between the Director of Public Works, the agents of the Yangtse Valley Co and Mesars Leigh & Orange, anting for the agents, and in none of these do ve find a single sentence upon the question of poles. As the principle upon which the poles were to be granted was settled in April 1901, and the form of parmanant way construction to be adopted was not absolutely accepted by the Company until after the receipt of the letter from your Department 1903 of the 15th August, and as it had been previously agreed that the form of permanent way construction to be employed should be settled by your Department, there could not have been an arrangement to concrete the full distance between the tracks providing the Company were allowed to erant centre poles. Is it not fully demonstrated that the requirements of the Director of Public Works have never been accq ted by us by the fact that we have been in negotiations with your Department, and that it was not until the 28th July 1903 that, so as to permit of the work being carried out, we cabled to our representative upon the spot instructing him to agree to the demands of the Director of Public Works save the question of the strip of concrete between the tracks, leaving this point to the decision of your Department. The Company are. and always have been,prepared to concrete for the full width hatween the tracks in the case of centre poles if the Director of Public Works would not insist upon the Company spanding money, which they considered quite unnecessary, in burying concrete in the roadway, but as the Director of Public Works insisted upon this, the Company had to stand upon their rights 2
2026-06-01 14:42:00 · Baseline
View content

717

-3-

was laid out upon that understanding, and a contract was

entered into upon that basis without any further reference

whatever to the Director of Pub'in Works other than the submission

of the plan previously mentioned.

*

We have referred to the copies of the correspondence,

dealing with the question of permanent way construction and the

cross sention submitted by us which has passed between the

Director of Public Works, the agents of the Yangtse Valley Co

and Mesars Leigh & Orange, anting for the agents, and in none of

these do ve find a single sentence upon the question of poles.

As the principle upon which the poles were to be granted

was settled in April 1901, and the form of parmanant way

construction to be adopted was not absolutely accepted by the

Company until after the receipt of the letter from your Department

1903

of the 15th August, and as it had been previously agreed that the

form of permanent way construction to be employed should be

settled by your Department, there could not have been an

arrangement to concrete the full distance between the tracks

providing the Company were allowed to erant centre poles.

Is it not fully demonstrated that the requirements of the

Director of Public Works have never been accq ted by us by the fact

that we have been in negotiations with your Department, and that

it was not until the 28th July 1903 that, so as to permit of the

work being carried out, we cabled to our representative upon the

spot instructing him to agree to the demands of the Director of

Public Works save the question of the strip of concrete between

the tracks, leaving this point to the decision of your Department.

The Company are.

and always have been,prepared to concrete

for the full width hatween the tracks in the case of centre poles if the Director of Public Works would not insist upon the Company spanding money,

which they considered quite unnecessary, in burying

concrete in the roadway, but as the Director of Public Works insisted upon this, the Company had to stand upon their rights

2

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.